COMPARISION BETWEEN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTROMAGNETICAL METHODS FOR MAPPING SALT WATER INTRUSION
| DC- resistivity and electromagnetic techniques are widely used to measure the electrical resistivity / conductivity of materials in the subsurface. Variations in these two parameters are caused by changers in soil characteristics- structures, clay content, degree of water saturation and conductivity of this water. Taking advantage of the relationship between electrical conductivity and chloride ionic concentration, we have attempted to map the saltwater intrusion in the Llobregat delta (Barcelona). For this purpose two different surveys have been conducted: vertical electrical sounding and electromagnetic mapping. This study us to compare the results and to contrast the obtained efficiency using each technique. |
As a rule, in in-phase operation the exploration depth of the EM-34 instrument
is about 1.5 times the separation distance between the coils, whereas with vertical
electrical sounding this depth is nearby 0.3 times the AB/2 distance electrodes. Thus, in
studying a big depth in the Llobregat delta-where many obstacles are present-, the EM
method is more useful than VES given that it needs a smaller distance between the receiver
and transmitter.
The cost-benefit of EM-34-3 is 5 times greater than VES, given that as a mean the number
of measured points was 30 per days in the EM method while was only 5 in the VES.
Edited by M. Himi